Content Moderation & Verification Policy | Jonsakkhi (jonsakkhi.org)

Moderation Philosophy: Objectivity, Fairness & Accountability

Jonsakkhi does not participate in trial by media or one-sided smear campaigns. Every operational process is guided by impartiality, evidentiary balance, and genuine public interest.

Each report submitted to our desk is evaluated by trained verification specialists against strict standardized criteria, ensuring that innocent individuals are protected from slander while genuine civic grievances are surfaced responsibly.

Sequential Moderation Stages

Stage 1

1. Submission & Ingestion (Submitted)

Initial system registration, deduplication check, and automated spam filtering upon intake.

Stage 2

2. Deep Manual Review (Under Review)

Corroboration of administrative office, geographic plausibility, and PII masking in attached files.

Stage 3

3. Clarification Request (Needs Info)

Inquiries sent to submitters when consented, requesting missing dates, receipts, or clarifications.

Stage 4

4. Evidentiary Corroboration (Verified Information)

Cross-checking circumstantial authenticity and consistency against public administrative records.

Stage 5

5. Public Ledger Entry (Published)

Redacted, neutral public case study published to open civic ledger and dashboard analytics.

Stage 6

6. Rejection or Archival (Rejected / Closed)

Submissions exhibiting personal spite, unverified rumors, or ethical violations are permanently rejected.

What does "Verified Information" signify?

Jonsakkhi is not a judicial tribunal or statutory criminal investigative agency. Therefore, the classification "Verified Information" does not represent a court-adjudicated verdict of guilt. Rather, it signifies that our editorial team has determined that the submission is coherent, supported by circumstantial and documentary evidence, devoid of manufactured falsehoods, and deemed relevant for open civic transparency.

Every published report maintains strictly objective phrasing, recording claims as "allegations" and financial figures as "demanded amounts".

Key Grounds for Immediate Report Rejection:

Interpersonal enmities, domestic disputes, business rivalry, or character assassination attempts.
Sectarian discrimination, communal incitement, hate speech, or incitement to physical violence.
Demonstrably fabricated narratives, deepfakes, altered photographs, or forged receipts.
Invasion of individual bodily or family privacy (e.g. non-consensual domestic images, private health dossiers).

Wish to Dispute or Request a Correction on a Published Case?

We hold ourselves to the highest standards of accountability. Public agencies, officials, and citizens may submit formal redressal appeals at any time.

Submit an Appeal or Correction